相关热词搜索：实证 分析 参考资料 论文 论文范文 论文实证分析 论文的实证分析
本论文主要论述了实证分析论文范文相关的参考文献,对您的论文写作有参考作用。
基金论文和其学术影响力关系实证分析
[摘 要] 近年来,基金论文比作为评价期刊的重要指标一直备受期刊界关注.以下载频次、被引频次和二次文献转载指标作为论文学术影响力的构成要素,以20家高校学报刊发的基金资助论文为研究样本,通过实证分析发现：基金论文和其学术影响力没有必然联系；对CSSCI来源期刊而言,其基金论文被读者高度关注,学术质量较高,而对非CSSCI来源期刊则不然；无论是否为CSSCI来源期刊,国家基金论文受读者关注的程度较高,但学术质量不一定比其他基金论文高.在编辑工作实践中,应客观理性地对待基金论文,以真正提高期刊的学术质量.
[关键词] 基金论文 下载频次 被引频次 二次文献转载 期刊评价
[中图分类号] G237 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1009-5853 （2015） 04-0029-04
Empirical Analysis on Connection between Fund Papers and their Academic Influence
Lin Lifang
（Editorial Department of Journal of Fujian Institute of Administration,Fuzhou,350001）
[Abstract] In recent years, the fund paper ratio, being regarded as an important index of journal evaluation, has been the focus of the journal. Taking download frequency, citation frequency and secondary literature selection index as the constituent elements of the academic influence and the articles supported by funds published in 20 college journals for the study sample, this paper finds from the empirical study that there is no necessary connection between fund papers and their academic influence. The fund papers published in the journals selected in the CSSCI are highly concerned by readers, and these papers also have high academic quality. But it is not the case to the fund papers which are not published in the CSSCI journals. National fund papers, whether published in the CSSCI journals or not, are highly concerned by readers, but these national fund papers do not have higher academic quality than other fund papers. In the practice of editing work, we should take an objective and rational attitude towards fund papers in order to really improve the academic quality of journals.
[Key words] Fund paper Download frequency Citation frequency Secondary literature selection index Journal evaluation
1 问题的提出
基金论文即各种基金资助课题的析出论文.基金论文比,是指期刊发表受各种基金资助的论文比例.近年来,《中文核心期刊要目总览》和《中国社会科学引文索引》来源期刊（CSSCI）等评价机构都将“基金论文比”作为评价期刊学术水平的重要指标.由此,“基金论文比”越来越受重视和追捧,不少期刊将该指标的逐年提高作为刊物可持续发展的重要因素[1].在实际操作中,基金项目资助论文特别是国家级基金论文往往成为初审合格或优先发表的条件,甚至不少期刊公然将这种“潜规则”付诸纸墨,纷纷为基金项目资助论文开辟“绿色通道”,或不惜向基金资助的专家支付高额稿酬,以吸引基金论文投稿,促使“基金论文比”指标的提高.理论上,基金资助课题经过同行专家评估和审核,代表一个研究领域的新动向、新趋势,其析出论文应具有较高的学术水准和应用价值.但是,基金资助论文的学术水平一定高吗?基金论文和其学术影响力是否成正相关关系?基于此,本文对基金论文和其学术影响力之间的关系进行实证分析,以期各期刊能客观对待基金论文,也对学术期刊质量评价有所裨益.
2 研究方法和数据来源
衡量论文的学术影响力,需要借助一些客观的评价指标.下载频次,体现期刊被人们阅读的频率,反映期刊在读者中的扩散程度.被引频次,是最能直接体现引文关系的期刊评价指标,反映期刊总的学术影响力.二次文献转载指标[2],反映各学科领域的学术动态和学术走向,二次文献转载的论文一般具有较高的学术质量和学术水平,论文若被二次文献转载说明其具有较高的学术价值.本文以下载频次、被引频次和二次文献转载指标为论文学术影响力的构成要素,以20家高校学报刊发的基金资助论文为研究样本,分析基金论文和其学术影响力之间的关系.
实证分析论文范文结:
适合实证分析论文写作的大学硕士及相关本科毕业论文，相关规范分析开题报告范文和学术职称论文参考文献下载。
